European countries are actively offering ideas and suggestions for a ceasefire in Ukraine, attempting to pave the way for peace talks through peace proposals. However, the differences between the United States and Europe, as well as Germany's criticism of the White House dispute, highlight the complex geopolitical game behind the Ukraine crisis.

1. European ceasefire proposals and disagreements:

On Monday (March 3), France proposed a preliminary one month ceasefire aimed at creating conditions for peace talks. The UK also stated that multiple ceasefire options are currently under discussion, but did not disclose specific details.

Britain, France and other countries have proposed to send troops to Ukraine if there is a ceasefire, but emphasized the need for support from the United States. This proposal is called "security guarantee" and aims to ensure that Russia will not launch aggression again.

2. Zelensky's position and the reaction of the United States:

Ukrainian President Zelensky emphasized that the ceasefire agreement must include clear security guarantees from the West. However, US President Trump refused to make any such assurances, leading to tension in the relationship between the two sides.

US National Security Advisor Waltz called on Zelensky to apologize and urged Ukraine to sign a mineral agreement and prepare for peace negotiations.

3. Germany's criticism and Europe's independence actions:

German Chancellor elect Mertz criticized last week's argument at the White House as a "predetermined trap," stating that it was a man-made escalation rather than a natural reaction.

Mertz emphasized that Europe must demonstrate its ability to act independently and called for increased defense spending to prove to the United States that the European continent can protect itself.

4. Unity and Future Plan for Europe:

European leaders unanimously agree that defense spending must be increased to address current security challenges. President of the EU Executive Committee von der Leyen said that she would inform member states of plans to strengthen Europe's defense industry and military capabilities.

Von der Leyen stressed that lasting peace can only be built on strength, and Europe needs to strengthen itself to ensure security.

Summary:

The multiple proposals put forward by European countries for a ceasefire in Ukraine reflect their active role in resolving the Ukrainian crisis. However, the differences between the United States and Europe, as well as Germany's criticism of the White House dispute, reveal the complex game behind the Ukraine issue. Europe is attempting to demonstrate its determination to act independently by increasing defense spending and strengthening its own capabilities, but the future peace process remains challenging. The ultimate resolution of the Ukrainian crisis requires not only the unity of Europe, but also the joint efforts of the international community.

It should be noted that if progress is made on Europe's ceasefire proposal, the Ukrainian crisis may ease and geopolitical risks may decrease, which could weaken the attractiveness of gold as a safe haven asset and potentially put pressure on gold prices.

The ceasefire proposal and the enhancement of Europe's independent action capability may benefit the euro, but the potential risks of differences between the US and Europe still need to be vigilant.